I don't usually, but... 10055
Kelsey Bjarnason
So what? You think that running a nasty on Linux can't do damage? What color is the sky in your world?
Yes, Windows installations are more consistent than Linux. Like the Mac, it is one of the reasons for ease of use. Linux is so fragmented that hardware and software developers don't want to waste time trying to support it.
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:25:39 +0000, Rich Bell Most distros of Linux are more consistent between each other than versions of Windows are between themselves. Consider that you could take...
How about delete everything on your system? Most distros have a lot of common applications. They can target the common stuff. You know, like Firefox, that has multiple security issues recently.
Yes, it is his fault if he installs some program he downloaded and it puts 100+ malware items on his computer.
Speaking of which, I see you are still not willing to admit to your lies about this alleged program you installed. Step up to the plate. Either produce the link or admit you made it up. I think we all know the truth. It's right in the COLAnut manual. Make outrageous claims and lie your butt off. Linux can't stand on it's own merits so you must constantly attack the infidel Microsoft. COLAnuts - we're not afraid to lie.
Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups