If... 1477
 |
Not at all. I was quite clear and stated "The snapping, snarling and yapping pink french poodles know who they are" which does not therefore include some linux advocates. Had you not snipped everything, you wouldn't have missed that piece. But that's what happens when those who think they are linux advocates selectively remove that which they can't handle, I suppose.
Yes, you did. Look:
"if Linux is as bad as the wintrolls claim"
followed by
"so the only thing trolls like Gerry can do is try to bash"
Do you see what you posted now in place of what you meant to post?
Gerry Sincere I see you snipped all the other reffences where you used "Linux advocates" and use just one...
No you didn't. See above.
Following on from rapskats 'The moment you've all been waiting for' thread concerning the release of Amarok 1.2. This music player really is the nuts. Radio streams. Not just radio streams but Cool Streams! Displaying...
Well, you were, actually, but I'll let that slide.
And repeating what you first posted will only buttist in serving you the realisation you didn't know what you were conveying to begin with.
And putting "ADVOCACY" in caps will not make stronger your case for making other believe you actually apply it. Nor will it make you appear more convincing.
So, are you saying your grammar skills don't extend to 'this' and 'that'. Do you really need me to show you up further on Usenet? Do you see how easily you have...
I can see your emotions are running high but I am only pointing out that your saying you advocate linux does not automatically show anyone you linux advocacy. You don't get it, do you?
So, now you're reduced to repeating what you want to say in an effort to convince yourself that what you want to convey is what you actually convey. Perhaps you should have done that at the beginning rather than just now.
No, it wasn't. You think it was, but it wasn't. Reread your post again and see that there was no advocacy of linux. You were critical and accusatory of me. Unless you're saying that that is your form of linux advocacy. Well are you saying that?
Oh yeah, here it comes. The old chestnut! I'm a liar. That's right, that is precisely the type of linux advocacy I referred to. Well done for proving my point.
You've proved nothing but that you're deluding yourself.
Not so, why should I. You're the one that is in accusatory mode.
You don't have a point when you accuse people of things they haven't done.
And getting angry about it, won't save you from your glaring mistake and lack of linux advocacy.
You buttumed "prejudicial stereotypes". They are your words, not mine.
Typical. I'm a liar am I. OK. So now what? How do you propose gaining receptive individuals to embrace linux if all your linux advocacy is accusatory and lies?
Your words, not mine.
Yes, you did. That you prevaricate so strongly over what you first posted is evidence enough. You are not a linux advocate. You nearly were, but you're not now.