| PLEX86 | ||
Levanta Releases Linux Management CodeThe Ghost In The Machine
This (sparse file) is possible (don't know.. that's why I asked in the first place). But thinking about this seems like it would be a house-keeping nightmare to keep things straight. Hopefully my explanation makes sense but here it goes... Big new news Indicators that Linux is leading Wintel collapsing 13765 On Thursday 10 November 2005 03:11, John Bailo stood up and spoke the following words to the mbuttes incomp.os.linux.advocacy...: I've had bad experiences... Say there is a large file - "Original.txt" Someone makes some edits to this ("Changes.txt") and saves it to disk. If I'm reading what you wrote correctly only the changed pages would be saved to disk. The rest (Original.txt) is stored elsewhere. But here is where it gets complicated. If someone now goes and makes more edits to Original.txt you would not expect those changes to get propogated to Changes.txt. The FS would need to update Changes.txt with the initial contents of Original.txt if it were edited. Big new news Indicators that Linux is leading Wintel collapsing Just heard on CNBC at 7:00 AM 11-8-2005: AMD chips were installed on 60% of... Then it gets more complicated. Changes.txt gets edited to Changes.txt' and Changes.txt' is modified and saved as Changes.txt''. If each one only had the sparse information (the changes) then a change to the original would require a "ripple effect" of changes to be applied to all the descendents from that file. Could be done... but seems like a nightmare to keep everything straight.
|
||||
Big new news Indicators that Linux is leading Wintel collapsing Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||