Linux What's that My own survey. 3147
 |
My initial point was that it is absurd that someone would not only state that the tilde means "the hard drive only", would not...
Again: I've never argued otherwise... in fact, I never saw anyone that argued otherwise despite all your pretending of it. You're clearly talking about your opinion of moral guilt. Where have I ever denied that you're enbreastled to your opinion on such a matter? That's what you are claiming I am arguing... as this thread showed and many others have shown, you're wrong with that erroneous claim.
Again: Incorrect... it is an argument showing that he *can* be considered guilty if seen under the same presumption you used to look. See your confusion YET?
I gave you a reason why what you pointed me to wasn't an argument that shows Bush *is* guilty... it's merely an argument showing that he *can* be considered guilty if seen under the same presumption you used to look. Under that presumption, regarding the evidence you claimed to have 'looked' at to reach your "conclusion", you stated:
"Right. It does not offer proof. The definition of proof is: "a formal series of statements showing that if one thing is true something else necessarily follows from it". While the evidence in my argument points to the conclusion and strongly supports it, it is not, technically, in a logical sense, proof."
Why would I agree with you that your argument shows Bush *is* guilty when even you admit your evidence for the argument offers no proof? Are you insane?
-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit