| PLEX86 | ||
Mandrake disappointment 1789begin virus.scr Kier Well, I took a llok with google, and he *answered* to posts here in cola in csma, and in csma alone. That is exceptionally bad form, since the posters he replied to had no indication at all that the post had been answered Which was exactly the reason for Snot to do it that way Well, I think it would be best if you follow your own advice and stop troll-feeding him That is not the point, and if you were not so extremely dishonest in your "reasoning" regarding Snots trolls, you would not even post such a garbage question Oh, that makes him so much better. Really OT Snits BS On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:15:49 +0000, Kier Really? I provided him with URLs, page references and suggestions to help him solve his problems. He responded by saying he know... Oh, you *are* blind. And stupid. And I don't care the least little bit what troll-feeders like you "appreciate". Live with the consequences of your actions Or, the other possibility, you can't admit that you were wrong regarding Snot, and so keep defending that butthole dispite you already know better Mandrake disappointment 1790 On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:43:32 +0100, Peter Kshlmann Yes, I daresay it is bad form. Nor would I suggest otherwise. Except that he replied to Elizabot and Rick, and his argument seems to be... So if Kadaitcha Toddler started talking "civil" to you (and to you alone) you would extend the same "courtesy" to him? Is *that* your reasoning? -- Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of those I had to kill because they peeed me off.
|
||||
Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||