PLEX86  x86- Virtual Machine (VM) Program
 CVS  |  Mailing List  |  Download  |     Newsgroups    

Pirates and thieves


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

Linux: In The Navy 16789
You should put a question mark at the end of an interogative sentence, malloc, it helps the understanding! LOL!!! To answer, though, the part of the article that was bullpoo...

The Economist Rails on Flawed BSA Piracy Study Posted by Jason Schultz

FC4 won't install Acrobat Reader 7 RPM, Java with Netbeans
begin KillFileMe.vbs Try running the latter like it says: .jdk-blah-blah.bin -console IIRC libstdc++ is a separate file. It is independent of gcc. Or it was, anyway. There are...

If you have a subscription to The Economist, make sure to check out their great critique of the BSA's latest software piracy numbers (BSA or just BS?; Software piracy):

IT SOUNDS too bad to be true; but, then, it might not be true. Up to 35% of all PC software installed in 2004 was pirated, resulting in a staggering $33 billion loss to the industry, according to an annual study released this week by the Business Software Alliance (BSA), a trade buttociation and lobby group.

Such jaw-dropping figures are regularly cited in government documents and used to justify new laws and tough penalties for pirates-this month in Britain, for example, two people convicted of piracy got lengthy prison sentences, even though they had not sought to earn money. The BSA provided its data. The judge chose to describe the effects of piracy as nothing less than "catastrophic".

But while the losses due to software copyright violations are large and serious, the crime is certainly not as costly as the BSA portrays. The buttociation's figures rely on sample data that may not be representative, buttumptions about the average amount of software on PCs and, for some countries, guesses rather than hard data. Moreover, the figures are presented in an exaggerated way by the BSA and International Data Corporation (IDC), a research firm that conducts the study. They dubiously presume that each piece of software pirated equals a direct loss of revenue to software firms.

To derive its piracy rate, IDC estimates the average amount of software that is installed on a PC per country, using data from surveys, interviews and other studies. That figure is then reduced by the known quanbreasty of software sold per country-a calculation in which IDC specialises. The result: a (supposed) amount of piracy per country. Multiplying that figure by the revenue from legitimate sales thus yields the retail value of the unpaid-for software. This, IDC and BSA claim, equals the amount of lost revenue.

Interestingly enough, the BSA is basically not taking Free Software into account at all in their studies. They're buttuming if there is software on your computer, and you have not bought commercial software for it...then you are a pirate.

For a more humorous take on the issue...



Your Ad Here

Linux | Previous | Next

FC4 won't install Acrobat Reader 7 RPM, Java with Netbeans

Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet

Help Two Softwares Needed