Pyriform doesn't and can't write meaningful content

Hi Pyriform,

You ooh, look, anotherJeffRelfsubthreadette !

Your failure to provide meaningful breastles, as the RFC suggests, is your loss, not mine... it just makes me look better in comparison.

All decent newsreaders, including Google and MicroSoftOutlook, do not use breastles to form the thread... only the References header is used.

You claim that I'm not following, as you say, UsenetConventions, yet I know, know that you can't read well enough to understand RFCs. You say your a programmer ? I seriously doubt it, you lack the discipline.

As usual, I'll be delivering code, all paid for, over the next few days. How about you ? You won't say, I know already.

How about you ? You won't say, because you can't.

You claimed that I don't know what Usenet spam is, yet here I very recently explained, complete with authoritative references, that spam is overly repebreastious crap, and when it's cancelable:

You also claimed I don't correctly buttign attributions, yet you failed provide an example of that, naturally, while I, in my last post to you, showed where you recently failed to do so:

RichD You concluded: I just don't care !

Yes, that's painfully obvious, further, you can't care... too stupid.