Register says DFS is wrong... 68 plus 12
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:54:06 +0000, spike1
I did think it must have something to do with the kernel (well, for obvious reasons!), but I've never seen a kernel oops, at least, not in that form (think I had something that might have been an oops of some kind once, but I'm pretty sure it looked different from that).
Certainly didn't convey much to me. Though the zero times zero bit is tyo do with memory location, isn't it? I'm not really up on this kind of stuff.
Not a great deal. It might mean something more to him. Possibly.
Register says DFS is wrong
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:47:28 +0000, Kier It's idiotic, but here again look who you're talking to. Again, *if* anyone needs or wants them, they...
Not that he'll ever admit it, of course.
Very seldom indeed, especially lately.
Register says DFS is wrong... 68 plus 14
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:22:25 +0000, William Poaster Which of course DFS seems to...
Telling you that its failed is dumb, if the program just fell over, you pretty well know that much altready
That's beyond my personal level of expertise. But I daresay it would be useful even to someone like me, if I had some more knowledgeable person to send the output to.
And he still hasn't provided a sensible and coherent reason for his obvious hatred of it. That might be something *worth* discussing.
I stand corrected :-)