Why do people switch to Linux 13486
begin virus.txt.scr T.G. Reaper
Nope, little one, you don't get to use the easy way out of tzhis. First you claim that linux fs are primitive, because even if they aren't, the enhanced features are not used by every one And then you want to exclude NTFS from this, were by the vast majority of users the ACLs aren't used *at* *all* By *your* definition, NTFS is an extremely primitive fs
Support, yes. Is it used much, no. Tell us all about the concurrent multi-user mode of XP. You know, the multi-user version which is the norm in linux Lets start with at least 15 users. Tell us all whats needed for that. We are talking "out of the box", naturally.
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:54, Tim Smith stood up and spoke the following words to the mbuttes incomp.os.linux.advocacy...: This is a deliberate fragmentation technique, and unlike a...
Well, the people using linux have definitive an opion about windows multi-user. It sucks donkey privatess
I would not be hard-pressed at all. But then, I am used to this kind of multi-user and use it all the time. A windows user does not even know any better, so he uses whatever crap MS hands him
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 07:58:27 +0000, Aragorn *All* file systems fragment, even the ones on under Linux. It's true that the allocation strategy used in Linux file systems...
Well, MS hands them shoddy software, and then blames the users for its failures. I always like that atbreastude. Makes life so much easier (for MS) -- Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
Why do people switch to Linux 13487
Linux Advocacy from Newsgroups