rapskat gets a conscience 10106
On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:23:10 -0400, DFS
How conveniently you ignored my followup to that post (made specifically because I knew some dippoo like you would automatically translate "better" to mean "newer")...
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 03:58:35 -0400, DFS No, my criticizing Vista requirements was because it would require major upgrades to existing systems running Windows, probably resulting in many persons scrapping perfectly good...
"Just to clarify this point, "better" in this case does not necessarily mean "newer"."
Just because hardware is newer doesn't mean it's better, especially if you cripple it by putting Windows on it.
Haha! You funny twit.
I've been using Linux for almost 5 years and it has yet to "let me down" anywhere near the extent that Windows has in the past.
Now I'm running what I feel to be a much superior platform and magnitudes better applications. I can do more with less, and I actually get to have fun in the process without putting a hurting on my wallet. Linux saves me money and makes me money.
I've proven to myself and many others that it is feasible and profitable to run a business using mainly Open Source Software.
rapskat Your followup was unnecessary. Of course newer is not necessarily better. I know what you meant. What I didn't understand is why you...
Oh, did your win98 P133 system up and die on you then? *snurk*
-- rapskat - 02:55:35 up 5 days, 12:10, 5 users, load average: 0.46, 0.55, 0.50 "What you end up with, after running an operating system concept through these many marketing coffee filters, is something not unlike plain hot water." -- Matt Welsh