2 programmers
I do not suppose a spelling checker would help you, but it is difficult to parse your posting.
This is possibly a legal question that can be answered only in court.
Another possibility is a homework buttignment from a high-school or college level clbutt of some kind. Some of the issues might include:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:30:45 -0700, Jack-ani There is little difference between them overall. It's like which car do you prefer Cadillac or Lincoln? Mandrake for many years enjoyed...
Is quanbreasty of code, or quality and design of code more important? In the unlikely event that each programmer's code does half the required function, I, personally, would say the programmer who accomplished the most work with the least code is more valuable, being (probably) simpler and therefore being more maintainable and containing fewer potential bugs. But others might say that what should be compensated would be the hours of coding effort and the writer of the greater quanbreasty of code should get the most money.
By the way, $10000 trillion dollars is ridiculous. Whatever that software does, someone else could do it all over from scratch for the U.S. national debt, which is roughly 1-1000 of that, or less. And if that is not possible, any code that would cost that much to develop would never work.
-- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. V PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. ^^-^^ 07:35:00 up 58 days, 1:29, 3 users, load average: 4.11, 4.16, 4.17