PLEX86  x86- Virtual Machine (VM) Program
 Plex86  |  CVS  |  Mailing List  |  Download  |  Linux  |  Newsgroups

Can't mount lvm through fstab


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

only 4 serial ports with kernel 2.6.14
After upgrading from 2.6.11.7 to 2.6.14.3 I seem to be limited to 4 serial ports (or have a problem with a 2-port board). dmesg before: Serial: 8250-16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 8 ports...

I am having the most bizzare problem. I hope someone can quickly identify the problem. I created a volume group and filesystem using LVM on an iscsi SAN. I can mount it just fine from the command line, but not when the same entry is in fstab. I'm running RHEL3 on a 2.4.20 kernel. I've copied and pasted the following information so you can see what it's doing and hopefully any useful information to help me fix this. TIA.

Why are the corporates so antiKDE 7331
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:15:26 -0500, Madhusudan Singh And I don't intend to participate in...

--- Volume group --- VG Name tollere3sanvg VG Access read-write VG Status available-resizable VG # 1 MAX LV 256 Cur LV 1 Open LV 0 MAX LV Size 2 TB Max PV 256 Cur PV 1 Act PV 1 VG Size 29.94 GB PE Size 32 MB Total PE 958 Alloc PE Size 928 29 GB Free PE Size 30 960 MB

dev-tollere3sanvg-vzvolumetollnx0001 --- Logical volume --- LV Name dev-tollere3sanvg-vzvolumetollnx0001 VG Name tollere3sanvg LV Write Access read-write LV Status available LV # 1 # open 0 LV Size 29 GB Current LE 928 Allocated LE 928 Allocation next free Read ahead sectors 1024 Block device 58:1

lvscan -- ACTIVE "-dev-tollere3sanvg-vzvolumetollnx0001" 29 GB lvscan -- 1 logical volumes with 29 GB total in 1 volume group lvscan -- 1 active logical volumes

Why are the corporates so antiKDE 7332
Crashdamage I used something like fvwm on Red Hat 5.0, and could barely stand it. I do not...

vgscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...) vgscan -- found active volume group "tollere3sanvg" vgscan -- "-etc-lvmtab" and "-etc-lvmtab.d" successfully created vgscan -- WARNING: This program does not do a VGDA backup of your volume groups

Why are the corporates so antiKDE 7330
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:24:45 -0500, Jean-David Beyer I suspect you're right, and Gnome certainly seems the more 'visible' of the two, probably largely due to RedHat's...

e2fsck 1.32 (09-Nov-2002) vztollere3: clean, 35074-30408704 files, 11086459-30408704 blocksvzdev-sda1 on type ext3 (rw) none onproc type proc (rw) none ondev-pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) usbdevfs onproc-bus-usb type usbdevfs (rw) none ondev-shm type tmpfs (rw)dev-tollere3sanvg-vzvolumetollnx0001 onvz type ext2 (rw) mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock ondev-tollere3sanvg-vzvolu metollnx0001, or too many mounted file systems LABEL=vztollere3 vz ext3 defaults 1 2



Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next

only 4 serial ports with kernel 2.6.14

Linux groups from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet

Compilation Error in CYGWIN