Celtic Knots vs Spaghetti

In any kind of communication and language, even in computer programming. We can see a difference between total spaghetti and celtic knot work. But it is easy to confuse the two, because sometimes a ball of spaghetti still makes sense and sometimes celtic knot work is total nonsense. I don't look at religion as spaghetti, and I don't look at my own writting as spaghetti. The philosophers, thinkers, and intellectuals who create beautiful Celtic Knots have a way of seducing everyone into believing them because of the beauty in their language. When archaic writing, common language, and crazy talk usually gets ignored and flamed even outside of usenet. But Carl Jung wrote that even crazy talk can contain messages which are important and relavent, and we all need to be sensitive to the fact that people like me can't express language as beautiful and as complex.

But if you look at physics like String Theory, you can tell that even though it is a beautiful piece of knot work, it is only expressing theorys in physics which are already understood. So it just shows that over complicated, exagerated, and prolonged conversation isn't always the ideal way to communicate.

Wikipedia is a great search engine because it is written in every day language, and you can read about subjects like mathematics and understand them without untying any complicated knots. That's the way my mathematics professor is at College. She facillitates my understanding of the complex texbooks which are only covering simple introductory calculus.

And I want to encourage all of you to work on your knot work, and to stop exagerating when you communicate. And to understand that there is a time and a place for brevity, and a time for lecturing.

Thoughts to think about!