Firewall security: Problems with simple Samba file share 3596

So?

It doesn't have to.

That's not the point. People from China aren't supposed to use the service. So they get excluded.

So?

Then he wouldn't be Chinese. He'd be American.

Of course not. You're wrong.

Of course not. Nobody said so.

No, it's not. It is known to be perfectly insecure. Just like any other piece of software. Granted, it's certainly not more insecure than other software products.

Yep. And there are certainly other holes. Holes, that are not generally known yet but for which exploits might already exist.

Of course now. Only you know.

Yes, it does. If a person has got a PK, he still needs to login FROM a valid IP. Those are already TWO conditions that have to be fullfilled.

Yes, that's a good summary of what you are saying. I agree.

Oh. So, summary: Successful exploits aren't successful. Break ins aren't relevant.

That's *VERY* logic. Sure. Don't you wonder, why nobody else understands your so called "logic"?

What are you talking about?

Ah yes. Funny. He gained access but he didn't. Sure.

Oh, by excluding a large part of the net, I don't cut down the number of people that might break in?

Another good summary of what you're writing.

...wrong. Yep. You are right again. Unfinished sentences are nice :)

You're *REALLY* funny. If a break in succeeded because a patch does not yet exist, it's not too late for a fix to appear.

Statistics don't matter.

Odd's don't matter.

Yeah, right.

Percentage doesn't matter either.

That's so totally wrong.

Again: The same old bullpoo.

Wrong. And you do know that. Every non daft person knows.

Or don't you know?

The proof for you being wrong. Yes.

Alexander Skwar -- They finally got King Midas, I hear. Gild by buttociation.