Firewall security: Problems with simple Samba file share 3603
I don't see any different - perhaps you can point out to me where the difference is (if you are trying to attach a meaning to "public login", you had better be specific about it! Are you trying to say that they do not allow login via ssh? Then perhaps you would explain how their private keys were stolen!).
What I just said - can't you read well?
You just said there are no logins allowed on them.
Must be.
Does matter. However they stole it, it indicates that they can penetrate your security.
Specific to you perhaps, but if you are trying to communicate to me, you need to use words that have a generally accepted common...
No it doesn't - do you really not get it? Putting jour jewels in a safe inside a concrete bunker on the planet uranus is great, but anyone who can get to uranus will find the concrete bunker and the safe no problem to deal with at all.
Ssh is the planet uranus. There is no attack at all that can break its encryption - if there were one, all bets are off, you can turn lead into lead into gold, etc. etc. You make it not one iota more secure by not allowing people from china to try and talk to it. Let them talk!
Indeed.
Since you don't do that, I don't see the need to do this either. Further, your statement is wrong. If I communicate with *you*, I don't...
Of course it does! The whole basis of ssh is cryptgraphy. What do you think this business of keys and ciphers is about. Let's repeat the aims of ssh:
Peter T. Breuer Generally, public access is taken to mean access from the internet, though it can also refer to a public kiosk or similar situation. I think it...
It is intended to provide secure encrypted communications between two untrusted hosts over an insecure network. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
See? Untrusted hosts! The host does not matter. Could be in timbuctu or china.
Peter
Firewall security: Problems with simple Samba file share 3604
Linux groups from Newsgroups
Firewall security: Problems with simple Samba file share 3602