GUI and Rapid Application Development 1540
What kind of document do you mean? No, I don't do it in a separate word-processor document. These usually won't keep up with the code. Yes, I do document the code in...
Promoting emacs...not the point of discussion Its personal preference, anyway.
Promoting emacs...not the point of discussion There's more than 1 way to do things.
Promoting emacs...not the point of discussion Right. I havent tried Emacs and might not in the coming year. Maybe later.
It is a clone of CVS, but it exists today.
Lee Sau Dan Isn't that good programming practise, anyway? Read the comment above. Absolutely, Change Logs are important to me too. So in...
Copy-paste or typing a command to copy is not hard, I feel. For the programs I am talking about, backups work fine. Learning VC sounds like a good approach, and a good suggestion.
Copy-paste isn't diff, and it does not let you know what you've modified since the last version (or any past versions). After using VC, I find me more confident in changing code, because I...
Promoting emacs...not the point of discussion I dont think its difficult to find files-directories in Windows or other OSes. Frankly, I dont know what process tagged files model is. But if I try Emacs someday, your post will be helpful.
I dont know, and do I care? Its more about existance of such packages. If cost is a question - I would look at how quickly I can get things done for free or by spending, and then weigh my options. Now that I know about emacspeak, emacs might be something to consider Promoting emacs...helped a bit this time
Accessibility options, right?
In a discussion with one of my cousins, it seems like .NET application development was faster than Tcl-Tk but I want to try myself to see what is faster for *my* type of applications before generalizing. Have you had your hands on either? If so, what are your findings (Ignore emacs this time).
GUI and Rapid Application Development 1541
Linux groups from Newsgroups