| PLEX86 | ||
|
Is Fedora *really* FreeDoes anyone here remember when the front page of fedora.redhat.com used to read: "The Fedora Project is a Red-Hat-sponsored and community-supported open source project. It is also a proving ground for new technology that may eventually make its way into Red Hat products. It is not a supported product of Red Hat, Inc." Question about yum: 5 different machines, 1 slow dialup connection I have 5 machines, all with a (more or less) stock CentOS 4.3 install (from the CentOS 4.3 CDs I... Now the reason I ask, is that I've just finished reading this article at lwn.net (prompted by another thread): boot record vs. MBR OK, let me try again. GRUB is not on the MBR because it failed twice to install on it with parbreastions messed up and heavy repair work. It is... The gist of the above article is that certain people at Fedora, (Red Hat?), seem to think that including SpyWare with a community distro is not only a good idea, but actually necessary to ensure the continuation of this FOSS distribution. It isn't so much the idea that the project leaders don't care about "alienating" its users, but more the implication that the degree of autonomy that the Fedora project has is little more than an illusion. The implication (from the article) is that unless the Fedora project can start providing metrics to Red Hat, then the project is in danger of losing funding, and hence be discontinued. Ubunku vs. SUSE, Gnome vs. KDE I am planning on getting started with Linux soon. What peaked my interest is I just went on a 3 week vacation to Germany and was shocked how much I... Is *this* what a "Community Distro" is all about? As a previous package maintainer, I have put considerable effort into this distro, and to have it threatened in this way by a supposedly impartial "parent", leaves a sour taste in my mouth. I find it particularly ironic, that a distro which strives so obsessively to purge itself of anything even potentially encumbered, should be itself so heavily financially encumbered by a commercial enbreasty. If Fedora is truly *Free*, then maybe it's about time that it proved it; by adopting a Debianesque "Software in the Public Interest" approach to financing, rather than be dictated to by what amounts to a corporate investor. So the question remains, and it's a serious one, from a serious and committed Fedora user and developer; is the Fedora Project really Free? -- K. .---- Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves. `---- Ubunku vs. SUSE, Gnome vs. KDE That's becuase Suse was originally a German distribution. It has now been bought by Novell and become much more corporate. If your Macs are PowerPC-based you'll... Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.16-1.2133FC5 08:23:12 up 119 days, 8:40, 3 users, load average: 2.54, 2.30, 2.28
|
||||
Question about yum: 5 different machines, 1 slow dialup connection Linux groups from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||