Linux Becomes Female 4590
Roy Schestowitz
I can understand what you're trying to do here. But trying to homogenize GNU-Linux and OSS product names to something more sanitized is not the answer. What drove *you* here? Were the names more 'professional' then? I don't get it? But I gotta tell ya, for me, it was the funky names and wild musings of the community as a whole. Sure, I've stayed because of the quality of the products. Hell, If I wanted a guy in a suit holding a tablet I'd have stuck with Microsoftie.
When I want half-naked people holding hands I look to Ubuntu, even though they took those fine folks down. Leave the naive users to their own makings. I'm happier over here with the GIMP, Apache and Debians of the world. Gotta love a distro that's named after a dude and his girlfriend.
On Saturday 27 August 2005 23:24, johnny bobby bee wrote : I imagine it was the neat programming environment and SSH (i.e. less leg work). Honestly. That's how I...
Trusted enough to be used by IBM, HP, governments of the world, most commercial websites, any higher learning insbreastution.
So? Where's the problem? All good things in due time. If not, those folk are allowed to suffer with their OS if they wish. It's a Free (and open source) world.
-- Let's not complicate our relationship by trying to communicate with each other.
Linux groups from Newsgroups