Microsoft Hatred FAQ 5144

On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:28:02 -0700, David Schwartz

Within rather broad limits, you can put any tyre you like on your car, but it is not practical to change your engine.

Within rather broad limits, you can run any OS you like on your computer.

Car manufacturers *like* the fact that there is enormous compebreastion in the tyre market. If (say) Bridgestone had an effective monopoly, they could charge whatever they liked and car manufacturers would have to pay it, or else not sell cars at all. So car manufacturers do not discourage consumers from choosing their own brand of tyre. If you, the consumer, cares enough to ask for Brand X tyres on your car, the dealer will fall over himself to please.

PC manufacturers, on the other hand, do discourage consumers from choosing their own brand of OS. As a result, the royalties they pay to Microsoft per PC is frequently more than the profit they make. Most white-goods PC resellers are lucky to make $50 profit on a PC, *before* wages. (Presumably Tier One vendors make more than that, but not that much more.)

And that is the mystery that needs to be explained. H-P-Compaq, Dell, Toshiba, and all the other Tier One and Tier Two vendors have no problem selling servers without operating systems. Some will even pre-install Linux on them for you. So why are consumers forced to make the choice of either paying for Windows with their laptop, or no laptop at all?

You will notice that only 30% of servers run Windows (lots of compebreastion in the server market) and over 90% of desktops (no compebreastion in the desktop market). Coincidence? I think not.

-- Steven.