Microsoft Hatred FAQ 5170
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:22:53 +0000, Not Bill Gates That is not true. The market was quite happy to buy competing products...
Yep. You got it.
David Schwartz That's the crux of the problem, isn't it? When you are a virtual monopoly, it is at least unlawful. The Sherman Anti-trust act as well as the...
Really? In what way? I think you'll find that in germany at least, Linux *IS* a brand of washing powder.
Looks good to me - buy my hamburgers in a shop that sells lots of different kinds in their freezer. I THINK you are trying to confuse hamburgers and restaurant chains, BTW. Uh, uh. Won't woik, stan. I know the difference.
No idea what they are, but I imagine they are something you tie round an ample midriff. Anyway, your example is the wrong way round - you mean "try to buy a lawn mower from Sears without paying for the price of a set of Craftsman tools". Or shumeshing.
Uh uh. No they don't. Discriminatory trading practices are, uh, illegal. You can't refuse to sell me something (or ratch up the price) just because you don't like me, or even worse, because you want to create a articial supply and demand situation. That's called "fixing the market".
I don't have to - shilling is as as shilling looks. If YOU want to find out what MS did wrong, read the official and legal reports, dude. The findings are findings of fact.
Peter
Linux groups from Newsgroups