Microsoft Hatred FAQ 5189
Snip...
And M$ is still intransigent about that LEGAL FACT, much to the dismay of the federal judge overseeing the latest (toothless) consent decree:
In a rare display of indignation, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly demanded an explanation from Microsoft's lawyers and told them, "This should not be happening."
Legal and industry experts said Microsoft's demands probably would have violated a landmark anbreastrust settlement the same judge approved in 2002 between the company and the Bush administration. The government and Microsoft disclosed details of the dispute in a court document last week.
More at:
Just to really get her riled, the M$ snakes pulled another stunt:
"This needs to get done," U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said of a project designed to help put potential rivals on a more equal compebreastive footing with Microsoft.
Uh - when microsoft produced dos 1.0, or whatever it was, I was sitting at my...
"If there's an issue of resources, then put them in," said Kollar-Kotelly, who endorsed the settlement with the U.S. government and state attorneys general in November 2002.
More at (line wrapped):
I've got a socket-pipe question.... I have a master process that communicates with a whole bunch of hardware (things like temperature sensors, position sensors, switches, and so on.) I also have...
852005-10-2623-14-09n26509630newsml
Any M$ apologists saying M$ isn't an illegal monopoly are just as much a part of that pack of liars and thieves as M$ itself.
They need to discuss it with Judge Colleen, and STignorantFU about it.
-- Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) * IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO FOLLOWS * Pardon any bogus email addresses (wookie) in place for spambots. Really, it's (wyrd) at airmail, dotted with net. DO NOT SPAM IT. Kids jumping ship? Looking to hire an old-school type? Email me.
Linux groups from Newsgroups