My Switch Between EXT3 and REISERFS AND EXT3 AND...... 715
My post only tells what happened to me for the past week, and I agreed reiserfs is mature enough for mid-high lvl regular linux users to use. But what I'm trying to get the point across is that the ext2-ext3 albeit slower in SOME cases (Daniel Robbins mention it actually pretty much even out when in normal usage), it's nice that I can default it back to ext2, and work with pretty much all the recover tools SHOULD there be any faulty hardware software problems.
Ahhh. Thanks for the pointer on posting. Good information. Thanks. You mentioned that, "... USB reader's SD slot is alwaysdev-sdc1 ...". My intent was to show that "always" was...
The 2nd post has no merit, and yes I use NT, starting from NT4-server2003 along with gentoo, FC, Suse (before Novell), Ubuntu, debian. I just have a computer science degree, workin my way for Master and I work for the sixth largest software consulting firm. I only consider myself newbie in Linux.
Again the machine is stable Dell, wno faulty Hardware. And sorry if I iconfused someone, the reiserfs is version 3, not 4. BUT my point is it's more dangerous using reiserfs in the sense that when it fail, and the buildin 2-3 command line tools dun work, you are left with VERY few options. And a disk drive left span can be rather short depend on luck.
BTW I'll add that I'm using a fedora testing version of 2.6.16 kernel
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:41:43 -0500, General Schvantzkoph staggered into the Black Sun and said: t1x.arnold, when using that broken "G2" excuse for a Usenet...
and Yes I'll BACKUP more often for sure.
Linux groups from Newsgroups