PLEX86  x86- Virtual Machine (VM) Program
 Plex86  |  CVS  |  Mailing List  |  Download  |  Linux  |  Newsgroups

Question about nvidia video card


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

On 10 Feb 2006 10:24:50 -0800, Vilmos Soti staggered into the Black Sun and said:

nForce 1234 is the name for a specific type of Northbridge and Southbridge chipset that's found on quite a few Athlon and Athlon 64 motherboards.

argv getting corrupt because of getenv issues
Hello, Trying to debug a weird problem here. When I run this program many times over, at some...

Heck no. The stuff in the official tarball is intended to drive a framebuffer display. The stuff in the tarball you downloaded from nVidia is designed to be used as an X module.

NVidia display driver installation
catetc-X11-xorg.conf grep glx Load "glx" name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation server glx version string: 1.3 server...

You didn't look at the nVidia tarball very hard. There's a fairly small bit of C code wrapped around a huge blob of binary-only code for the kernel module. nVidia are not allowed to release parts of that binary-only code due to paranoia and lawyers and trade secrets and agreements with people like SGI and so forth. The X server module that nVidia ships is binary-only too, but it runs in userspace and conforms to the X 4.0 ABI, so they don't *have* to release source.

It's not possible to build the evil binary-only module into the kernel. You're going to need to use modules for this thing to work at all.

-- Matt GThere is no Darkness in Eternity-But only Light too dim for us to see Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin mail: TRAP + SPAN don't belong ----------------------------- penguins, is Tux." --MegaHAL



Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next

NVidia display driver installation

Linux groups from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet

Quick and dirty system recovery: Is this method OKAY