| PLEX86 | ||
|
Snort fails to resolve DNSHi everyone! Problem with serialmultiportcard Hi, took a PC, put in a serial-multi-port-PCI-card (8-port) and installed it with RHEL AS4 (Kernel 2.6.9-5.EL). Redhat recognized the multi-port-card... I've installed snort 2.4.3 with BASE in a Red Hat enterprise edition Linux server which has 6 network ports, 5 for sniffing and 1 for management. The sniffing cards don't have IP addresses (I've used the "ifup eth#"), and they are also in promiscuous mode. Everything works fine, except 1 thing. The thing is that I cannot use the local Whois function in Snort. I've even installed a BIND DNS server at the same machine(locally) with no success at all. When I "click" at any IP at the Snort(BASE) web interface the Local Whois doesn't resolve the DNS and it displays only once the following error: "No route to host". It also displays "FQDN: (no DNS resolution attempted)". It looks like the Snort doesn't know what interface to use for DNS resolution. I've set up correctly the DNS Server at the management interface (the interface having the IP) and when I "ping" anything(from the shell) with its name it replies back. So the system itself uses the local DNS Server (BIND) for DNS resolution. What is the problem for Snort?? Should I use IPs in ALL interfaces?? But why?? Why doesn't it use the management interface for DNS resolution?? I don't think it's a good idea to give an IP to the sniffing interfaces...its better to remain undetected. Now I'll post some configuration files in order to have a better picture of the situation.(maybe I forgot something, who knows..) This is my resolv.conf file: nameserver 172.16.love.XX (the machine with Snort and BIND) nameserver 172.16.love.XX (another local DNS Server) nameserver 172.16.love.XX (another local DNS Server) search (my dns suffixes)... A serious Question new I have Perl books. The books I was asking was about in the above thread was for System... This is my routing table: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 172.16.168.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2 168 plus 1.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth2 default 172.16.168.62 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2 Any help would be greatly appreciated! (Please feel free to forward this to any relevant newsgroup)
|
||||
Problem with serialmultiportcard Linux groups from Newsgroups The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet
|
||||