| PLEX86 | ||
|
Subject:procparbreastions and fdiskHi, I used drakx and fdisk to fiddle around with my parbreastions (mdk10.1), and it all seemed to work fine. Mdk was happy, all was running smooth. Now I had some free space. And I decide to do a mandriva install. To my surprise, it told me that the parbreastion table was too corrupt, but I decided to go on anyway. And then it told me that my sda had the maximum no. of parbreastions it could have, and that I should first delete some of them. This was unexpected. Then I came back to mdk and looked atproc-parbreastions and fdisk -l. They disagree!!! Re:procparbreastions and fdisk What did you do. Resize parbreastions? If so, did you also resize the filesystems inside? Check specifically the windows filessystem sizes. Default maximum... Here are the outputs: fdisk -l: Diskdev-sda: 160.0 GB, 16004188568 plus 16 bytes 90 heads, 63 sectors-track, 55129 cylinders Units = cylinders of 5670 * 512 = 2903040 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id Systemdev-sda1 * 1 3702 10493248+ 7 HPFS-NTFSdev-sda2 6646 55129 137452140 f W95 Ext'd (LBA)dev-sda3 3702 6645 8342932+ a5 FreeBSDdev-sda5 6646 18139 32585458+ b W95 FAT32dev-sda6 18518 18726 589648+ 83 Linuxdev-sda7 18726 20590 5284408+ 83 Linuxdev-sda8 20590 20968 1073488+ 83 Linuxdev-sda9 18140 18517 1071598+ 82 Linux swapdev-sda10 20968 plus 1 24767 10770133+ 83 Linuxdev-sda11 40152 55129 42462598+ 83 Linuxdev-sda12 35000 40151 14605920 83 Linux proc-parbreastions: major minor #blocks name 8 0 156290904 sda 8 1 10493248 sda1 8 2 1 sda2 8 3 8342932 sda3 8 5 32585458 sda5 8 6 589648 sda6 8 7 5284408 sda7 8 8 1073488 sda8 8 9 1071598 sda9 8 10 10770133 sda10 8 11 42462598 sda11 8 12 524288 sda12 8 13 2097152 sda13 8 14 262144 sda14 8 15 3145728 sda15 drakx matches with fdisk -l. Also, while I modified my parbreastions, I got error 16 from fdisk everytime I tried to write out the table, though it didn't seem to harm. mandriva installation's output matches withproc-parbreastions. How do I bring them to sync? And which is the correct one? Thanks, Manu.
|
||||