PLEX86  x86- Virtual Machine (VM) Program
 Plex86  |  CVS  |  Mailing List  |  Download  |  Linux  |  Newsgroups

windows h& linux history 1832


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

Windows 3.0 (1990) and 3.1 (1992) had the same (nearly) VMM as Win98-Me, and was able of running several DOS VMs. The Windows apps themselves were running in 16bit protected mode.

VMM was written in around 87-88 for a product called Windows-386.

I would more say "DOS was used as a component" within Windows 3.x OS. For instance, in Windows 3.11 we had a 32bit disk driver instead of int 13h and 32bit FAT support instead of int 21h. The SMB network stack was also all 32bit, except the NIC driver itself.

windows h& linux history 1833
was But a Darn. IMO, Win98SE (with some ME patches) was the 2nd best OS, they ever produced. It ranks right after MS-DOS. XP ranks as the most paternalistic, least user...

DPMI was always supported by VMM, I think from Windows 3.0 at least.

No. ME and 98 differ in tiny details.

The main difference between 98 and 95 is the NTKERN.VXD wrapper, which emulated a subset of Win2000 driver APIs (the subset was called Windows Driver Model - WDM) over the good old VMM. This allowed to run binary-portable drivers across 98 and 2000, built with 2000 DDK.

windows h& linux history 1834
Simon Schršder compared to ie6, ie7 is a real improvement. and i'm comfortable working with ie7. (on vista you get ie7+, on xp only ie7) "similar looks"? i would be very surprised...

The whole USB and 1394 stacks in Win98 were written this way. I was able running OHCI1394 and 1394BUS binaries from w2k beta under Win98.

But, except NTKERN and WDM, Win98 is the same as Win95 OSR 2.

windows h& linux history 1835
Neither Win98 nor MS-DOS can be called "stable", due to architectural problems of their. Well, DOS was written for an ancient CPU which could not support the real stable OS...

Win95 OSR 2 is the 1997-vintage OS which introduced FAT32.

Internally, it is absolutely another. A real well-designed OS, without looking back to the atrocious DOS legacy. Under NT, Win32 is a wrapper layer around the "native NT calls".

Yes. NT 5.0 and NT 5.1, look at version stamps on system files.

From what I know on Vista now - it is a major step from XP, around the same

-- Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP StorageCraft Corporation



Your Ad Here

List | Previous | Next

windows h& linux history 1833

Linux groups from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Provider on the Internet

windows h& linux history 1831